Pase v. Woodside Heights Land Corp.
108 N.Y.S. 125
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The court, upon the rendition of the verdict, set it aside and ordered a new trial. It must be assumed that the order was made upon the exceptions. Rule 31, Supreme Court; section 20, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1496, c. 580). I think that the order was right, inasmuch as the learned Municipal Court- charged the jury that the defendant was bound to use extraordinary care, which is not tha. rule.
Order of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pase v. Woodside Heights Land Corp., 108 N.Y.S. 125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
108 N.Y.S. 125 (Pase v. Woodside Heights Land Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edelson v. Monahan
126 N.Y.S. 583 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)