Pascuzzo v. Pascuzzo
This text of 55 A.D.2d 947 (Pascuzzo v. Pascuzzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[948]*948In a matrimonial action, defendant appeals from stated portions of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 30, 1976. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The trial court, in chambers, ascertained what the testimony of the parties’ children would be on the issue of cruel and inhuman treatment. Since the defendant had previously admitted certain acts of cruelty, the court properly excluded the children’s anticipated testimony as immaterial. We have considered appellant’s other points and find them to be without merit. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hargett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.D.2d 947, 391 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pascuzzo-v-pascuzzo-nyappdiv-1977.