Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd.

8 A.D.3d 26, 777 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 26 (Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd., 8 A.D.3d 26, 777 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2003, which, in an action to recover for lead poisoning, denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting reports of the parties’ respective experts raise an issue of fact as to whether the subject apartment was contaminated with lead. We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Pelham Plumbing & Heating Corp.
20 A.D.3d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 26, 777 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pascual-v-kingsley-realty-holdings-ltd-nyappdiv-2004.