Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd.

8 A.D.3d 26, 777 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2003, which, in an action to recover for lead poisoning, denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting reports of the parties’ respective experts raise an issue of fact as to whether the subject apartment was contaminated with lead. We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2003, which, in an action to recover for lead poisoning, denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting reports of the parties’ respective experts raise an issue of fact as to whether the subject apartment was contaminated with lead. We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd., 8 A.D.3d 26, 777 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

8 A.D.3d 26 (Pascual v. Kingsley Realty Holdings, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related