Pascual Felipe-Felipe v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
This text of 457 F. App'x 599 (Pascual Felipe-Felipe v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Guatemalan citizen Pascual Matías Felipe-Felipe petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). In support of his application, Felipe-Felipe had asserted that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his American-citizen daughter. In his petition for review, he argues that the immigration judge and the BIA misapplied the law by improperly weighing the relevant hardship factors.
Upon careful review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review Felipe-Felipe’s petition. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir.2007) (under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), this court lacks jurisdiction to review denial of cancellation of removal for failure to prove exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to American-citizen child); see also Guled v. Mukasey, 515 F.3d 872, 880 (8th Cir.2008) (petitioner’s argument that immigration judge improperly weighed factors in denying cancellation of removal essentially challenged adverse discretionary conclusion and did not present reviewable question of law).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
457 F. App'x 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pascual-felipe-felipe-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2012.