Paschal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Paschal v. State

1936 OK CR 124, 62 P.2d 101, 60 Okla. Crim. 160, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 30, 1936

DocketNo. A-9115.

StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK CR 124 (Paschal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paschal v. State, 1936 OK CR 124, 62 P.2d 101, 60 Okla. Crim. 160, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of one year, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on April 15, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and sentenced to be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of one year, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on April 15, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1936 OK CR 124, 62 P.2d 101, 60 Okla. Crim. 160, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paschal-v-state-oklacrimapp-1936.