Paschal v. State
774 So. 2d 775, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15937, 2000 WL 1781082
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1831·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Carl T. Paschal does not exceed the legal maximum, see § 813.011, Fla. Stat. (1965), and therefore his motion to correct illegal sentence is denied. Defendant’s challenge to the factual basis underlying his conviction is one which must be brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and as such, is time-barred. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paschal v. State, 774 So. 2d 775, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15937, 2000 WL 1781082 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
774 So. 2d 775 (Paschal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Naylor v. State
790 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)