Paschal v. Hardwick
This text of 23 S.E.2d 465 (Paschal v. Hardwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. While in an action for damages based upon the alleged unlawful homicide of the plaintiff’s husband, the plaintiff can not in one count allege both wanton and slight negligence on the part of the defendant (Southern Ry. Co. v. McCrary, 55 Ga. App. 406, 190 S. E. 195), yet it is well settled by numerous decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that she can do so in different counts of her petition.
2. Applying the above-stated ruling to the facts of this case, the court erred in disallowing the amendment to the petition offered by the plaintiff, and that error rendered the further proceedings in the ease nugatory.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 S.E.2d 465, 68 Ga. App. 571, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paschal-v-hardwick-gactapp-1942.