Paschal v. Hardwick

23 S.E.2d 465, 68 Ga. App. 571, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1942·No. 29706.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. While in an action for damages based upon the alleged unlawful homicide of the plaintiff’s husband, the plaintiff can not in one count allege both wanton and slight negligence on the part of the defendant (Southern Ry. Co. v. McCrary, 55 Ga. App. 406, 190 S. E. 195), yet it is well settled by numerous decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that she can do so in different counts of her petition.

2. Applying the above-stated ruling to the facts of this case, the court erred in disallowing the amendment to the petition offered by the plaintiff, and that error rendered the further proceedings in the ease nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paschal v. Hardwick, 23 S.E.2d 465, 68 Ga. App. 571, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

23 S.E.2d 465 (Paschal v. Hardwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. Hill
159 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.
293 P.2d 717 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)