Pasch ex rel. Pasch v. Stenberg
This text of 148 A. 923 (Pasch ex rel. Pasch v. Stenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A boy, while playing ball in Union City, New Jersey, was struck and injured by defendant’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the boy’s mother for $1,000 for expenses incurred by her, and a verdict in favor of the lad for $1,250.
The plaintiffs’ rule for a new trial rests on the issue of •the adequacy of the damages in favor of the boy. In the light of the testimony of plaintiffs’ physician that he has made a complete recovery and that he merely suffers from a little toeing-in, it is unnecessary to disturb the verdict of the jury.
The rule will be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 A. 923, 8 N.J. Misc. 23, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pasch-ex-rel-pasch-v-stenberg-nj-1929.