Pascal, S. v. City of Pgh ZBA
This text of Pascal, S. v. City of Pgh ZBA (Pascal, S. v. City of Pgh ZBA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
STEPHEN PASCAL AND CHRIS GATES, : No. 142 WAL 2020 : Petitioners : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD : OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY OF : PITTSBURGH AND NORTHSIDE : LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The parties are directed to state their
positions -- and to stipulate if possible -- regarding whether LaShawn Burton-Faulk served
on the Northside Leadership Conference Board of Directors during the Zoning Board of
Adjustment proceedings. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as
stated by Petitioners, are:
(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s order upholding the grant Owner of the zoning relief requested despite the conflict of interest of ZBA member Burton-Faulk?
(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s order upholding the grant to Owner of the zoning relief requested where the ZBA failed to issue a written decision within forty-five (45) days of the public hearing and where applicant did not agree in writing or on the record to an extension of time within forty-five (45) days of the public hearing?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pascal, S. v. City of Pgh ZBA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pascal-s-v-city-of-pgh-zba-pa-2020.