Pascal Nikiema v. Nicolas Pascal
This text of Pascal Nikiema v. Nicolas Pascal (Pascal Nikiema v. Nicolas Pascal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0900 Lower Tribunal No. 17-29627-CA-01 ________________
Pascal Nikiema, Appellant,
vs.
Nicolas Pascal, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.
The Law Offices of Gold & Parado, and James L. Parado and Alan C. Gold, for appellant.
Hutchison Law, P.A., and Courtney D. Hutchison (Naples); Rizk Law, PLLC, and Beshoy Rizk, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brickell v. Trammell, 82 So. 221, 230 (Fla. 1919) (“Land
does not pass as appurtenant to land.”). See also Rivas v. Solary, 18 Fla.
122, 127 (Fla. 1881) (stating that “land does not pass as appurtenant to
land”); S. Venice Corp. v. Caspersen, 229 So. 2d 652, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA
1969) (“As a general rule, land does not pass under a deed as an
appurtenance to land.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pascal Nikiema v. Nicolas Pascal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pascal-nikiema-v-nicolas-pascal-fladistctapp-2025.