Pascal Nikiema v. Nicolas Pascal

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0900 Lower Tribunal No. 17-29627-CA-01 ________________

Pascal Nikiema, Appellant,

vs.

Nicolas Pascal, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

The Law Offices of Gold & Parado, and James L. Parado and Alan C. Gold, for appellant.

Hutchison Law, P.A., and Courtney D. Hutchison (Naples); Rizk Law, PLLC, and Beshoy Rizk, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brickell v. Trammell, 82 So. 221, 230 (Fla. 1919) (“Land

does not pass as appurtenant to land.”). See also Rivas v. Solary, 18 Fla.

122, 127 (Fla. 1881) (stating that “land does not pass as appurtenant to

land”); S. Venice Corp. v. Caspersen, 229 So. 2d 652, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA

1969) (“As a general rule, land does not pass under a deed as an

appurtenance to land.”).