Pascagoula National Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank

Supreme Court

Pascagoula National Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank

269 U.S. 537, 46 S. Ct. 119

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 30, 1925·No. No. 242·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Transferred to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, upon-the authority of the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 3, 39 Stat. 727, [538]*538and section 238 of the Judicial Code as amended by section 238 (a), act of September 14, 1922, c. 305, 42 Stat. 837; act of February 13, 1925, sec. 14; Heitler v. United States, 260 U. S. 438.

Mr. Alexander W. Smith, Jr., with whom Mr. Alexander W. Smith was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Hollins N. Randolph, Montgomery Angelí, Newton D. Baker, Robert S. Parker and F. H. Watkins were on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Transferred to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, upon-the authority of the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 3, 39 Stat. 727, [538]*538and section 238 of the Judicial Code as amended by section 238 (a), act of September 14, 1922, c. 305, 42 Stat. 837; act of February 13, 1925, sec. 14; Heitler v. United States, 260 U. S. 438.

Mr. Alexander W. Smith, Jr., with whom Mr. Alexander W. Smith was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Hollins N. Randolph, Montgomery Angelí, Newton D. Baker, Robert S. Parker and F. H. Watkins were on the brief, for appellees.

Pascagoula National Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 269 U.S. 537, 46 S. Ct. 119 (1925).

Pincite

269 U.S. 537 (Pascagoula National Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related