Pas v. Centredale Wonsted Mills

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Pas v. Centredale Wonsted Mills

3 R.I. Dec. 140

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 16, 1927·No. W.C.A.No.687·Published

Opinion

RESCRIPT

TANNER, P. J.

I do not believe this woman could have gotten employment anywhere crippled as she is. She evidently went around and [141]*141was refused. She evidently did make some attempt because she did take care of this child. I am-inclined to-say she is entitled to this rate which has been given for this period, less the $20 that she did make.

Fojr Petitioner: Max Winograd. For Respondent. R. M. Greenlaw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RESCRIPT

TANNER, P. J.

I do not believe this woman could have gotten employment anywhere crippled as she is. She evidently went around and [141]*141was refused. She evidently did make some attempt because she did take care of this child. I am-inclined to-say she is entitled to this rate which has been given for this period, less the $20 that she did make.

Fojr Petitioner: Max Winograd. For Respondent. R. M. Greenlaw.

Pas v. Centredale Wonsted Mills, 3 R.I. Dec. 140 (R.I. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

3 R.I. Dec. 140 (Pas v. Centredale Wonsted Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.