Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/PARZYCK v. State

PARZYCK v. State

995 So. 2d 1164, 2008 WL 5158579
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 2008·No. 2D08-2327·Published

Opinion

995 So.2d 1164 (2008)

Joseph C. PARZYCK, III, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D08-2327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 10, 2008.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the postconviction court summarily denying Joseph Parzyck's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Parzyck may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion, within sixty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case, alleging that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress the firearm. Such a motion shall not be considered successive.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARZYCK v. State, 995 So. 2d 1164, 2008 WL 5158579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

995 So. 2d 1164 (PARZYCK v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.