Parvin v. State
This text of 136 S.W. 452 (Parvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the appellant was indicted in the District Court of Eastland County, charged with the offense of assault to murder on J. R. Stubblefield. The venue of this offense was changed to Callahan County by the court. Hpon a trial defendant was adjudged guilty of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for two months.
The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this cause because of insufficient recognizance, and this motion is well taken, but should we overlook this motion there is ¿either a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record, and the record being in this condition, we will presume that the judge charged the law and all the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence. Wright v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 146; Jones v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 642, and authorities cited.
Motion is sustained and cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 S.W. 452, 62 Tex. Crim. 63, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parvin-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.