Parun v. Clark

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Parun v. Clark

6 Teiss. 335, 1909 La. App. LEXIS 109

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 31, 1909

DocketNo. 4712

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Teiss. 335 (Parun v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parun v. Clark, 6 Teiss. 335, 1909 La. App. LEXIS 109 (La. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

ST. PAUL, J.

This case .presents only a question of lacx, [336]*336the solution of which depends entirely upon the degree of crecut to which the testimony of the various witnesses may be entitled -

May 31, 1909.

Their testimony is highly conflicting, but the District Judge saw and heard them all and took active part in their examination. He personally inspected the property about which they testified, and which forms the subject'of this controversy. His conclusions are therefore entitled to great •weight and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.

<¡)ur examination of the record does not warrant us in reaching the conclusion that there is any manifest error in the judgment appealed from, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ST. PAUL, J.

This case .presents only a question of lacx, [336]*336the solution of which depends entirely upon the degree of crecut to which the testimony of the various witnesses may be entitled -

May 31, 1909.

Their testimony is highly conflicting, but the District Judge saw and heard them all and took active part in their examination. He personally inspected the property about which they testified, and which forms the subject'of this controversy. His conclusions are therefore entitled to great •weight and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.

<¡)ur examination of the record does not warrant us in reaching the conclusion that there is any manifest error in the judgment appealed from, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Teiss. 335, 1909 La. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parun-v-clark-lactapp-1909.