Partridge v. Powell
36 A. 419, 180 Pa. 22, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 862
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 25, 1897
DocketAppeal, No. 316
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 36 A. 419 (Partridge v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Partridge v. Powell, 36 A. 419, 180 Pa. 22, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 862 (Pa. 1897).
Opinion
There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications.
For reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, we are all of opinion that the service of the writ of summons was rightly set aside. There is nothing in the case that requires special notice.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clark v. Honegger Farms Co.
55 Pa. D. & C.2d 745 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Sheeran v. Ravella
18 F.R.D. 411 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
Cowperthwait v. Lamb
95 A.2d 510 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Scott v. Simmons
27 Pa. D. & C. 383 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Ewing v. Elliott
181 S.E. 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Walker's Appeal
144 A. 288 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Burroughs v. Cocke & Willis
1916 OK 130 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Roschynialski v. Hale
201 F. 1017 (D. Nebraska, 1913)
Peet v. Fowler
170 F. 618 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
36 A. 419, 180 Pa. 22, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/partridge-v-powell-pa-1897.