Partridge v. Patterson

6 Iowa 514
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 13, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Iowa 514 (Partridge v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Partridge v. Patterson, 6 Iowa 514 (iowa 1858).

Opinion

Woodward, J.

— If the course taken by the court afforded cause of complaint, it would be on the part of the plaintiff, rather than of the defendant, because a finding against the plaintiff, would put him to the necessity of a new action ; whereas, if the court decided it, he could avail himself, probably, of an amendment, instead of being sent out of court. Put there was no error in the proceeding. If the court was unable to determine satisfactorily upon the date, it was within their discretionary power to refer the question to the jury. Jefferson Co. v. Savary, 2 G. Greene, 238; Converse v. Warren, 4 Iowa, 158.

[516]*516The ruling of the court in relation to proof of the signature of the guarantor, was correct. Tlie point has been decided several times under the different statutes. Steinhelber v. Edwards, 2 G. Greene, 366; Chambers v. Games, 2 Ib., 320; Lyon v. Bunn, ante, 48.

The judgment, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Converse v. Warren
4 Iowa 158 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Iowa 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/partridge-v-patterson-iowa-1858.