Partridge v. Partridge

47 N.J. Eq. 601
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided November 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order below is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court ■of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Partridge v. Partridge, 47 N.J. Eq. 601 (N.J. Ct. App. 1890).

47 N.J. Eq. 601 (Partridge v. Partridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sire Plan, Inc. v. Brown
134 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
In Re Brown's Estate
134 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
In Re Brueck
199 A. 61 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)
In Re Hazeltine
182 A. 357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1936)
In Re Fulper
99 N.J. Eq. 293 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)