Partridge v. Blanchard
23 Minn. 69, 1876 Minn. LEXIS 89
Opinion
The complaint sets out a contract [71]*71for the sale and delivery of the sheep, and a breach of the contract. In such a case the general allegation of damage is sufficient to admit proof of, and a recovery for, general damages, and it is not ground of demurrer that the allegation of special damage is insufficient.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Partridge v. Blanchard, 23 Minn. 69, 1876 Minn. LEXIS 89 (Mich. 1876).
23 Minn. 69 (Partridge v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merritt v. Adams County Land & Investment Co.
151 N.W. 11 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
Matteson v. United States & Canada Land Co.
115 N.W. 195 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)