Partners Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.

224 A.D.2d 672, 638 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1900

This text of 224 A.D.2d 672 (Partners Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Partners Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Kraft General Foods, Inc., 224 A.D.2d 672, 638 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover a real estate broker’s commission, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated November 1, 1994, as denied that branch of their motion which is to dismiss the fourth cause of action for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendants’ motion which is to dismiss the fourth cause of action is granted, and the fourth cause of action is dismissed.

The plaintiff commenced this action against, inter alia, the defendant Kozy Shack, Inc., alleging that it had tortiously interfered with the plaintiff’s contract to obtain a broker’s commission when Kozy Shack, Inc., offered to purchase, and subsequently did purchase, a parcel of real estate. The plaintiff had allegedly previously procured a buyer who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the property. In order to state a cause of action for tortious interference with a contract, a plaintiff must allege, inter alia, that a defendant wrongfully interfered with the contract (see, Kronos, Inc. v AVX Corp., 81 NY2d 90; Guard-Life Corp. v Parker Hardware Mfg. Corp., 50 NY2d 183; EDP Hosp. Computer Sys. v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr., 212 AD2d 570). The plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to plead such wrongful conduct (see, Nassau Diagnostic Imaging & Radiation Oncology Assocs. v Winthop-University Hosp., 197 AD2d 563). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.
406 N.E.2d 445 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.
612 N.E.2d 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Nassau Diagnostic Imaging & Radiation Oncology Associates v. Winthrop-University Hospital
197 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
EDP Hospital Computer Systems, Inc. v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center
212 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 672, 638 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/partners-commercial-real-estate-services-inc-v-kraft-general-foods-inc-nyappdiv-1996.