Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud

150 So. 136, 112 Fla. 225
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 2, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its1 judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court'that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud, 150 So. 136, 112 Fla. 225 (Fla. 1933).

150 So. 136 (Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry
297 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)