Partin v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Partin v. Edwards

88 S.E. 745, 17 Ga. App. 834, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 971

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 24, 1916

Docket6821

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 745 (Partin v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Partin v. Edwards, 88 S.E. 745, 17 Ga. App. 834, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 971 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. This was an action to recover damages for b-each of a contract and, under the facts of the case, the court erred in excluding the testimony of the plaintiff as to the loss of profits.

2. The court erred in excluding the letter written by the defendant to the plaintiff, as it was admissible for the purpose of explaining an ambiguous statement in the written contract entered into by the parties.

3. It was error to exclude the evidence of the plaintiff that there were no logs on the mill yard when he stopped sawing.

4. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.

6. The assignments of error not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are deemed abandoned. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI