Partin v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Partin v. Commonwealth

279 S.W. 335, 212 Ky. 346, 1926 Ky. LEXIS 141

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 S.W. 335 (Partin v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Partin v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W. 335, 212 Ky. 346, 1926 Ky. LEXIS 141 (Ky. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Appellant was convicted of knowingly selling Jamaica ginger for beverage purposes, and the insufficiency of the evidence is the principal ground urged for a reversal of the judgment. Jamaica ginger is one of the articles included in section 2554a-26, Kentucky Statutes, 1924, and the .statute malíes it an offense knowingly to sell such article for beverage purposes, or to sell same under circumstances from which the seller might reasonably deduce the intention of the purchaser to use it for such purpose. Elliott v. Commonwealth, 194 Ky. 576, 240 S. W. 61. We have ruled that the purchase of several bottles of Jamaica ginger at the same time, or the purchase of Coco Cola and a single bottle at the same time, or the purchase of a single bottle of a similar *347 article on several occasions within a short period of time was sufficient to take the case to the jury and sustain a judgment of conviction. Walker v. Commonwealth, 202 Ky. 831, 261 S. W. 598; Arbuckle v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 834, 266 S. W. 653; Cravens v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 738, 266 S. W. 625; Williams v. Commonwealth, 207 Ky. 807, 270 S. W. 61. In this case no prior punchases of appellant by the prosecuting witness were proved. It was not shown that he purchased the Jamaica ginger in connection with another' beverage, or that he was in the habit of drinking Jamaica ginger or' flavoring extracts for beverage purposes and that this habit was known to appellant. The Commonwealth merely proved that the prosecuting witness bought one bottle of Jamaica ginger from appellant, and we are constrained to the view that this alone was ’insufficient to take the case to the jury. Thompson v. Commonwealth, 202 Ky. 674, 261 S. W. 5. It follows that appellant’s motion for a peremptory instruction should have been sustained.

Judgment, reversed and. cause remanded for a new trial 'consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Appellant was convicted of knowingly selling Jamaica ginger for beverage purposes, and the insufficiency of the evidence is the principal ground urged for a reversal of the judgment. Jamaica ginger is one of the articles included in section 2554a-26, Kentucky Statutes, 1924, and the .statute malíes it an offense knowingly to sell such article for beverage purposes, or to sell same under circumstances from which the seller might reasonably deduce the intention of the purchaser to use it for such purpose. Elliott v. Commonwealth, 194 Ky. 576, 240 S. W. 61. We have ruled that the purchase of several bottles of Jamaica ginger at the same time, or the purchase of Coco Cola and a single bottle at the same time, or the purchase of a single bottle of a similar *347 article on several occasions within a short period of time was sufficient to take the case to the jury and sustain a judgment of conviction. Walker v. Commonwealth, 202 Ky. 831, 261 S. W. 598; Arbuckle v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 834, 266 S. W. 653; Cravens v. Commonwealth, 205 Ky. 738, 266 S. W. 625; Williams v. Commonwealth, 207 Ky. 807, 270 S. W. 61. In this case no prior punchases of appellant by the prosecuting witness were proved. It was not shown that he purchased the Jamaica ginger in connection with another' beverage, or that he was in the habit of drinking Jamaica ginger or' flavoring extracts for beverage purposes and that this habit was known to appellant. The Commonwealth merely proved that the prosecuting witness bought one bottle of Jamaica ginger from appellant, and we are constrained to the view that this alone was ’insufficient to take the case to the jury. Thompson v. Commonwealth, 202 Ky. 674, 261 S. W. 5. It follows that appellant’s motion for a peremptory instruction should have been sustained.

Judgment, reversed and. cause remanded for a new trial 'consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 S.W. 335, 212 Ky. 346, 1926 Ky. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/partin-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack