Partida v. MVD
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
3 Petitioner-Appellant,
4 v. No. 31,460
8 MEXICO, KEITH PERRY, Director,
9 Respondent-Appellee.
11 John A. Dean, District Judge
12 Victor Titus 13 Farmington, NM
14 for Appellant
15 N.M. Taxation and Revenue Department 16 Julia A. Belles 17 Santa Fe, NM
18 for Appellee
20 FRY, Judge. 1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the third calendar notice.
2 No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has
3 expired.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
10 11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Partida v. MVD (Partida v. MVD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.