Parsons v. State

105 S.E. 380, 26 Ga. App. 82, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 286
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 16, 1920
Docket11890
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 380 (Parsons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parsons v. State, 105 S.E. 380, 26 Ga. App. 82, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A theft of chickens was charged in the indictment; the prosecutrix swore that the chickens found in the possession of the defendants on the night of the theft were her chickens, and there was evidence that the defendants admitted stealing the chickens. It was therefore . not error to overrule the motion for a new trial,- the only ground relied upon being that the evidence did not authorize the verdict of guilty.

Judgment a'jjirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., conem.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 380, 26 Ga. App. 82, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-state-gactapp-1920.