Parsons v. Spicer
This text of 272 A.D.2d 787 (Parsons v. Spicer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the Trial Court erroneously refused to submit to the jury the question whether the plaintiff and the defendant, Spicer, were in the same employ at the time of the accident. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-spicer-nyappdiv-1947.