Parsons v. Rye National Bank
This text of 242 A.D. 696 (Parsons v. Rye National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order in so far as it strikes out the affirmative defense contained in paragraphs fourteenth to eighteenth of defendants’ answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the defendants may properly allege as an affirmative defense the matters that have been struck out by the order appealed [697]*697from and plaintiff will not be prejudiced thereby. (Clode v. Scribner’s Sons, 200 App. Div. 532; Savage Realty Co., Inc., v. Lust, 203 id. 55.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-rye-national-bank-nyappdiv-1934.