Parsons v. Rye National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parsons v. Rye National Bank

242 A.D. 696

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order in so far as it strikes out the affirmative defense contained in paragraphs fourteenth to eighteenth of defendants’ answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the defendants may properly allege as an affirmative defense the matters that have been struck out by the order appealed [697]*697from and plaintiff will not be prejudiced thereby. (Clode v. Scribner’s Sons, 200 App. Div. 532; Savage Realty Co., Inc., v. Lust, 203 id. 55.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order in so far as it strikes out the affirmative defense contained in paragraphs fourteenth to eighteenth of defendants’ answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the defendants may properly allege as an affirmative defense the matters that have been struck out by the order appealed [697]*697from and plaintiff will not be prejudiced thereby. (Clode v. Scribner’s Sons, 200 App. Div. 532; Savage Realty Co., Inc., v. Lust, 203 id. 55.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Parsons v. Rye National Bank, 242 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 696 (Parsons v. Rye National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related