Parsons v. Roby

92 A. 736, 77 N.H. 600, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 195
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 1, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 92 A. 736 (Parsons v. Roby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parsons v. Roby, 92 A. 736, 77 N.H. 600, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 195 (N.H. 1914).

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

This proceeding involves the same property the title to which was in litigation between the same parties in Day v. Roby, ante, 144. The administrator of Volney Day’s estate now seeks to prevent Mrs. Roby from disposing of the property, upon the ground that it is charged with the payment of Volney’s debts. As the plaintiff failed to prove the allegation upon which his claim depended, his petition was rightly dismissed. No brief has been filed in support of the plaintiff’s exceptions, and no error has been found in the rulings of the superior court. The claim that it was the plaintiff’s right to have the defendant’s rights curtailed without opportunity to make objection on her part is not entitled to serious consideration.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A. 736, 77 N.H. 600, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-roby-nh-1914.