Parsons v. Pond
This text of 25 F. App'x 77 (Parsons v. Pond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, and [78]*78was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Hall’s Ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated October 24, 2000.
We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F. App'x 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-pond-ca2-2002.