Parsons v. Pierson
This text of 28 N.E. 97 (Parsons v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant alleges in his complaint that the appellee Pierson brought an action against him, before a justice of the peace ; that the parties appeared; that upon the appellant’s request a jury was called ; that the evidence was heard; that the foreman of the jury orally announced a finding against the appellant; that no written verdict was returned ; that the justice entered judgment for the suni named by the foreman of the jury. Prayer for an injunction restraining the collection of the judgment.
The appellant had an adequate legal remedy, and can not have relief by injunction. His remedy was by appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 N.E. 97, 128 Ind. 479, 1891 Ind. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-pierson-ind-1891.