Parsons v. Jameson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Parsons v. Jameson

47 A. 412, 70 N.H. 625

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 A. 412 (Parsons v. Jameson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parsons v. Jameson, 47 A. 412, 70 N.H. 625 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230.

Exception sustained.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230.

Exception sustained.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A. 412, 70 N.H. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-jameson-nh-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack