Parsons v. Jameson
47 A. 412, 70 N.H. 625
Opinion
The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230.
Exception sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parsons v. Jameson, 47 A. 412, 70 N.H. 625 (N.H. 1899).
47 A. 412 (Parsons v. Jameson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davenport v. White Mountain Power Co.
27 A.2d 104 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1942)
Nadeau v. Sawyer
59 A. 369 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1904)