Parsons v. City of Westbrook
This text of Parsons v. City of Westbrook (Parsons v. City of Westbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-15-522
DARRELL PARSONS,
Plaintiff Curr~ : ·· - ~=
V. MA1, I~ ,::.; ORDER
RECc.1\/FD CITY OF WESTBROOK,
Defendant
Before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant City of
Westbrook. That motion, filed on February 14, 2017, included a 21-day notice stating that
opposition to the motion had to be filed within 21 days and that a failure to file timely opposition
would be deemed a waiver of all objections to the motion. See M.R.Civ.P. 7(b)(l)(A), 7(c)(3).
Plaintiff Darrell Parsons has not filed any opposition to the motion. Nevertheless the Law
Court has ruled that, even where no opposition has been filed, courts are nevertheless required to
review the statement of material facts submitted by a party moving for summary judgment in
order to determine whether the material factual assertions are properly supported. See Cote Corp.
v. Kelley Earthworks Inc., 2014 ME 93 ~ 8, 97 A.3d 127.
Accordingly, the court will take the motion under advisement and will determine whether
the unopposed motion should be granted.
The entry shall be:
Under advisement order issued. The Clerk is directed to incorporate this order in the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a). Dated: March r (;, , 2017
Thomas D. Warren Justice, Superior Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Parsons v. City of Westbrook, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-city-of-westbrook-mesuperct-2017.