Parsons v. Cain

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Parsons v. Cain

8 S.C.L. 196

DecidedMay 15, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 8 S.C.L. 196 (Parsons v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parsons v. Cain, 8 S.C.L. 196 (S.C. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Nott, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case the defendant had suffered an ior a judgment by deiault to be entered J o «/ agajlist him. When the cause was submitted to the Jury to assess the damages, they were informed by the presiding Judge, that as defendant had made default, he had admitted that the plantiff had a good cause of action against him, and was, therefore, entitled to a verdict. That they could not find for the defendant, but according to the case of Reigne vs. Dewees, 2d Bay 405, they must give the plaintiff something, if it were but a cent.

The Jury, nevertheless, found a verdict for the defendant.

A motion is now made to set that verdict aside, and grant a new trial; and this Court is of opinion that the motion ought to be granted, A defendant is, in no case, entitled to a verdict, while an order for judgmentstands unreversed against him.

The other Judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nott, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case the defendant had suffered an ior a judgment by deiault to be entered J o «/ agajlist him. When the cause was submitted to the Jury to assess the damages, they were informed by the presiding Judge, that as defendant had made default, he had admitted that the plantiff had a good cause of action against him, and was, therefore, entitled to a verdict. That they could not find for the defendant, but according to the case of Reigne vs. Dewees, 2d Bay 405, they must give the plaintiff something, if it were but a cent.

The Jury, nevertheless, found a verdict for the defendant.

A motion is now made to set that verdict aside, and grant a new trial; and this Court is of opinion that the motion ought to be granted, A defendant is, in no case, entitled to a verdict, while an order for judgmentstands unreversed against him.

The other Judges concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 S.C.L. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-cain-sc-1817.