Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Asch

S.D. New York

Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Asch

196 F. 215, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1546

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedApril 8, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 196 F. 215 (Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Asch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Asch, 196 F. 215, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1546 (S.D.N.Y. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBF,: Circuit Judge.

Defendant is selling a chain grip for automobile wheels, which is substantially an infringement of the complainant’s-patent. Connected to one of the side members of each chain grip which it sells is a- short leather strap-with snap hooks at both ends, and the purchaser is given at the time of delivery of the article ■a printed notice which instructs him to-use this strap so as to-anchor the grip to a spoke, of the wheel and thus prevent its creeping. It is contended that by so doing infringement is avoided. This contention has been overruled in other, causes which came before this court, although no more was written in those causes than-a brief indication of-the disposition made of the motion. I concur with the opinion of Judge Killits in Weed Chain Company v. Cleveland Company (August 9, 1910) 196 Fed. 213, and do not think it necessary to add anything to its discussion of the single point here presented.

The -motion' is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBF,: Circuit Judge.

Defendant is selling a chain grip for automobile wheels, which is substantially an infringement of the complainant’s-patent. Connected to one of the side members of each chain grip which it sells is a- short leather strap-with snap hooks at both ends, and the purchaser is given at the time of delivery of the article ■a printed notice which instructs him to-use this strap so as to-anchor the grip to a spoke, of the wheel and thus prevent its creeping. It is contended that by so doing infringement is avoided. This contention has been overruled in other, causes which came before this court, although no more was written in those causes than-a brief indication of-the disposition made of the motion. I concur with the opinion of Judge Killits in Weed Chain Company v. Cleveland Company (August 9, 1910) 196 Fed. 213, and do not think it necessary to add anything to its discussion of the single point here presented.

The -motion' is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 F. 215, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-non-skid-co-v-asch-nysd-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack