Parson v. Wilmer Hutchins Independent School District

112 F. App'x 995
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 2004
Docket04-10491
StatusUnpublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 995 (Parson v. Wilmer Hutchins Independent School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parson v. Wilmer Hutchins Independent School District, 112 F. App'x 995 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Bridget Parson appeals the district court’s order setting aside default judgment against Wilmer Hutchins Independent School District. A motion to set aside a default judgment is interlocutory and nonappealable. Parks v. Collins, 761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir.1985) (“When an order ... ‘merely vacates the judgment and leaves the case pending for further determination, the order is akin to an order granting, a new trial and is interlocutory and nonappealable’ ”) (quoting 7 J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶60.30[3] (2d ed.1983)). Moreover, the district court has not certified this case for interlocutory appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Accordingly, we DISMISS Parson’s appeal. All outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. Collins
761 F.2d 1101 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parson-v-wilmer-hutchins-independent-school-district-ca5-2004.