Parson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parson v. State

798 So. 2d 798, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15041, 2001 WL 1267765

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 24, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-3523

StatusPublished

This text of 798 So. 2d 798 (Parson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parson v. State, 798 So. 2d 798, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15041, 2001 WL 1267765 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), because it was untimely. While we conclude it was timely under Wood, we nevertheless affirm because the motion was legally insufficient. See State v. Perry, 786 So.2d 554 (Fla.2001); Bartz v. State, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), rev. denied, 767 So.2d 453 (Fla.2000), and rev. denied, 767 So.2d 461 (Fla.2000).

GUNTHER, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), because it was untimely. While we conclude it was timely under Wood, we nevertheless affirm because the motion was legally insufficient. See State v. Perry, 786 So.2d 554 (Fla.2001); Bartz v. State, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), rev. denied, 767 So.2d 453 (Fla.2000), and rev. denied, 767 So.2d 461 (Fla.2000).

GUNTHER, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

798 So. 2d 798, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15041, 2001 WL 1267765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack