Parsley v. STATE, EX REL. DISABILITY SERVS. DIV.
This text of 98 P. 1013 (Parsley v. STATE, EX REL. DISABILITY SERVS. DIV.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this contempt case, the trial court sentenced defendant Snodgrass to six months in jail. On appeal, defendant contends that the record does not demonstrate that he was advised of his right to counsel, as required by ORS 33.055(8) and (9). 1 The state concedes that the record does not establish that defendant was advised of his right to counsel and that the judgment must be reversed and remanded for that reason. We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded.
ORS 33.055 provides, in part:
“(8) A defendant is entitled to be represented by counsel. A court shall not impose on a defendant a remedial sanction of confinement unless, before the hearing is held, the defendant is:
“(a) Informed that such sanction may be imposed; and
“(b) Afforded the same right to appointed counsel required in proceedings for the imposition of an equivalent punitive sanction of confinement.
“(9) If the defendant is not represented by counsel when coming before the court, the court shall inform the defendant of the right to counsel, and of the right to appointed counsel if the defendant is entitled to, and financially eligible for, appointed counsel under subsection (8) of this section.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 P. 1013, 196 P.3d 81, 223 Or. App. 602, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsley-v-state-ex-rel-disability-servs-div-orctapp-2008.