Parshall v. Smith
This text of 7 N.Y.S. 951 (Parshall v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the evidence was sufficient to justify the justice in finding that the materials furnished by the plaintiff’s assignor were furnished to the defendant, and in holding her liable therefor. Fairbanks v. Mothersell, 60 Barb. 406,408; Fowler v. Seaman, 40 N. Y. 592; Garretson v. Seaman, 54 N. Y. 652; Husted v. Mathes, 77 N. Y. 388; Treman v. Allen, 15 Hun, 4; Tiemeyer v. Turnquist, 85 N. Y. 516; Mackey v. Webb, 6 N. Y. Supp. 795; chapter 381, Laws 1884.
We are also of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to establish the sale and transfer to the plaintiff of the claim upon which this action was brought. We have examined the rulings of the justice on the admission and rejection of evidence, and have found none that disclose error or require special discussion. We think the county court has rendered judgment according to the justice of the case, and that such judgment should be affirmed. Sections 1206, 1207, Code Civil Proc. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 N.Y.S. 951, 3 Silv. Sup. 476, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 639, 53 Hun 638, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parshall-v-smith-nysupct-1889.