Parsells Petroleum Products, Inc. v. White

156 A. 832, 109 N.J. Eq. 364, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 572
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 19, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether ■the decree should be reversed, the decree is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

The decree appealed from is affirmed by an equally divided •court.

For affirmance — Parker, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Wells, JJ. 7.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Tan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsells Petroleum Products, Inc. v. White, 156 A. 832, 109 N.J. Eq. 364, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 572 (N.J. 1931).

156 A. 832 (Parsells Petroleum Products, Inc. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Palmer
18 A.2d 711 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Levy v. D'Alesandro
185 A. 543 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)