Parry v. State

21 Tex. 746
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

It is said by Hr. Wharton that, at Common Law, a noUe prosequi may be at any time retracted, and is not only no bar to a subsequent prosecution on another indict- ' ment, but may be so far cancelled as to require proceedings on the original bill. (Whart. Am. Cr. L. 514.) We see nothing to prevent the defendant from consenting that the entry be set aside during the Term; as the record abundantly shows he did. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parry v. State, 21 Tex. 746 (Tex. 1858).

21 Tex. 746 (Parry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Watson
68 N.E.2d 265 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1946)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Thor v. Ashe, Warden
11 A.2d 173 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
United States v. Rossi
39 F.2d 432 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)