Parry Oil Co. v. Michaels

Court of Appeals of Texas

Parry Oil Co. v. Michaels

230 S.W. 223, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 21, 1921

DocketNo. 1219.

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W. 223 (Parry Oil Co. v. Michaels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parry Oil Co. v. Michaels, 230 S.W. 223, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 164 (Tex. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

Parry Oil Company, a joint-stock association, brought this action against Mike Michaels, A. L. Erwin, J. O. McCoomb, and J. W. Horn for a writ of injunction restraining each of the defendants from interfering with an oil well, from committing waste or damage, and from removing any oil well machinery or equipment from said well.

Upon presentation of the petition the court granted a temporary writ. Later defendants filed an answer praying that the temporary writ be dissolved. The transcript shows a judgment which purports to have been “entered as of October 1, 1920,” dissolving the writ.

The record does not disclose that there was a notice of appeal given as provided by article 2085, Rev. Civ. Statutes. Russell v. Koenneeke, 190 S. W. 253.

Por this reason, the cause must be dismissed from the docket of this court.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, C. J.

Parry Oil Company, a joint-stock association, brought this action against Mike Michaels, A. L. Erwin, J. O. McCoomb, and J. W. Horn for a writ of injunction restraining each of the defendants from interfering with an oil well, from committing waste or damage, and from removing any oil well machinery or equipment from said well.

Upon presentation of the petition the court granted a temporary writ. Later defendants filed an answer praying that the temporary writ be dissolved. The transcript shows a judgment which purports to have been “entered as of October 1, 1920,” dissolving the writ.

The record does not disclose that there was a notice of appeal given as provided by article 2085, Rev. Civ. Statutes. Russell v. Koenneeke, 190 S. W. 253.

Por this reason, the cause must be dismissed from the docket of this court.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W. 223, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parry-oil-co-v-michaels-texapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack