Parrow v. Sexton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Parrow v. Sexton

595 A.2d 467, 324 Md. 41, 1991 Md. LEXIS 157

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedSeptember 12, 1991

DocketNo. 169

StatusPublished

This text of 595 A.2d 467 (Parrow v. Sexton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrow v. Sexton, 595 A.2d 467, 324 Md. 41, 1991 Md. LEXIS 157 (Md. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to consider issues arising out of an auctioneer’s sale of an ownership interest in a cooperative apartment unit where the sale of ownership shares, or the right of occupancy in the unit, or both, were restricted by the by-laws of the cooperative corporation, and the corporation would not approve the purchaser.

[42]*42After a thorough review of the record, we find that the bylaws of the corporation are not included in the pleadings, transcript, or exhibits, and that we are unable to determine the exact nature of the restriction here involved. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

WRIT OF CERTIORARI DISMISSED; COSTS TO BE PAID BY PETITIONERS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to consider issues arising out of an auctioneer’s sale of an ownership interest in a cooperative apartment unit where the sale of ownership shares, or the right of occupancy in the unit, or both, were restricted by the by-laws of the cooperative corporation, and the corporation would not approve the purchaser.

[42]*42After a thorough review of the record, we find that the bylaws of the corporation are not included in the pleadings, transcript, or exhibits, and that we are unable to determine the exact nature of the restriction here involved. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

WRIT OF CERTIORARI DISMISSED; COSTS TO BE PAID BY PETITIONERS.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 A.2d 467, 324 Md. 41, 1991 Md. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrow-v-sexton-md-1991.