Parrow v. Sexton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Parrow v. Sexton

595 A.2d 467, 324 Md. 41, 1991 Md. LEXIS 157

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 12, 1991·No. No. 169·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to consider issues arising out of an auctioneer’s sale of an ownership interest in a cooperative apartment unit where the sale of ownership shares, or the right of occupancy in the unit, or both, were restricted by the by-laws of the cooperative corporation, and the corporation would not approve the purchaser.

[42] After a thorough review of the record, we find that the bylaws of the corporation are not included in the pleadings, transcript, or exhibits, and that we are unable to determine the exact nature of the restriction here involved. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

WRIT OF CERTIORARI DISMISSED; COSTS TO BE PAID BY PETITIONERS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to consider issues arising out of an auctioneer’s sale of an ownership interest in a cooperative apartment unit where the sale of ownership shares, or the right of occupancy in the unit, or both, were restricted by the by-laws of the cooperative corporation, and the corporation would not approve the purchaser.

[42] After a thorough review of the record, we find that the bylaws of the corporation are not included in the pleadings, transcript, or exhibits, and that we are unable to determine the exact nature of the restriction here involved. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

WRIT OF CERTIORARI DISMISSED; COSTS TO BE PAID BY PETITIONERS.

Parrow v. Sexton, 595 A.2d 467, 324 Md. 41, 1991 Md. LEXIS 157 (Md. 1991).

Pincite

595 A.2d 467 (Parrow v. Sexton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.