Parrott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Parrott v. State

123 S.E. 732, 32 Ga. App. 414, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 430

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1924

Docket15498

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 732 (Parrott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrott v. State, 123 S.E. 732, 32 Ga. App. 414, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 430 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Under the particular facts of the ease the admission of evidence as complained of in the motion for a new trial was not error.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having met with the approval of the trial judge, this court is powerless to interfere with the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. The facts of the instant ease distinguish it from that of Sanders v. State, 24 Ga. App. 329 (100 S. E. 784), relied upon by counsel for plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. H. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI