Parrott v. Coggins
This text of 155 S.E. 317 (Parrott v. Coggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not necessary to decide whether the act of 1929 (Ga. Laws 1929, p. 260), by means of a map made a part of the act, designates one or two roads from Eayetteville south. Whether considered as one or two, it was the duty of the county treasurer to pay the warrant for expenses incurred by the county in making a survey as indicated, unless there was some other attack on the validity which ' constituted a legal cause to refuse payment. Since the court expressly •refused to consider the other grounds alleged, the judgment is reversed and remanded for a further hearing and adjudication.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 S.E. 317, 171 Ga. 342, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrott-v-coggins-ga-1930.