Parrott v. City of Perry
This text of 240 S.W.3d 735 (Parrott v. City of Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
James V. Parrott (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial *736 Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying him benefits after he was injured while employed as a volunteer firefighter for the City of Perry. 1 We find that the Commission did not err in finding that Claimant was not in the course of his employment when he was injured.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
. Claimant makes no claims against the Second Injury Fund in this appeal. The Second Injury Fund did not file a respondent’s brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 S.W.3d 735, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563, 2007 WL 3342496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrott-v-city-of-perry-moctapp-2007.