Parrott v. City of Perry

240 S.W.3d 735, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563, 2007 WL 3342496
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2007·No. ED 89428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James V. Parrott (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial *736 Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying him benefits after he was injured while employed as a volunteer firefighter for the City of Perry. 1 We find that the Commission did not err in finding that Claimant was not in the course of his employment when he was injured.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Claimant makes no claims against the Second Injury Fund in this appeal. The Second Injury Fund did not file a respondent’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrott v. City of Perry, 240 S.W.3d 735, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563, 2007 WL 3342496 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

240 S.W.3d 735 (Parrott v. City of Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stegman v. Grand River Regional Ambulance District
274 S.W.3d 529 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)