Parrot v. Habersham

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Parrot v. Habersham

18 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 14

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJune 15, 1801

StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1234 (Parrot v. Habersham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrot v. Habersham, 18 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 14 (circtddc 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to quash an execution issued upon an exemplification from Montgomery county, in Maryland, because the record was not authenticated by a certificate of the chief judge, or presiding magistrate. The motion was overruled by THE COURT, because the exemplification was such an one as seems to be contemplated by the 13th section of the act concerning the District of Columbia, of 27th February, 1801 (2 Stat. 103).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to quash an execution issued upon an exemplification from Montgomery county, in Maryland, because the record was not authenticated by a certificate of the chief judge, or presiding magistrate. The motion was overruled by THE COURT, because the exemplification was such an one as seems to be contemplated by the 13th section of the act concerning the District of Columbia, of 27th February, 1801 (2 Stat. 103).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrot-v-habersham-circtddc-1801.