Parrot v. Farnsworth

1 Brayt. 174
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1817·Published

Opinion

IN an action of assumpsit, on a note of hand, the defendant may avoid the note, by shewing in evidence, under the general issue, that the note was given for a pretended patent righit [175] which was void, on the ground of its not having been an original invention ; although a deed, with covenant, was made by plaintiff to defendant, conveying the patent right, and although the patent remains unrepealed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrot v. Farnsworth, 1 Brayt. 174 (Vt. 1817).

1 Brayt. 174 (Parrot v. Farnsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.