Parrot v. City of Tallahassee

381 U.S. 129, 85 S. Ct. 1322, 14 L. Ed. 2d 263, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1307
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 3, 1965·No. 958·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Florida Circuit Court is reversed. Robinson v. Florida, 378 U. S. 153.

Respondent asserts that the judgment below rests on an adequate independent state ground in that petitioners, through misunderstanding or oversight, failed to obtain certification of the Circuit Court record submitted with their otherwise timely petition for writ of certiorari in the Florida District Court of Appeal, First District. Petitioners tried to correct this non jurisdictional defect (see, e. g., Aris v. State, 162 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.)) when notified of it, but their petition was dismissed nonetheless. We do not find this procedural ground adequate to bar review by this Court. See Staub v. City of Baxley, 355 U. S. 313; NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U. S. 449; NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U. S. 288.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrot v. City of Tallahassee, 381 U.S. 129, 85 S. Ct. 1322, 14 L. Ed. 2d 263, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1307 (1965).

381 U.S. 129 (Parrot v. City of Tallahassee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of Ohio
235 F.3d 280 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
People v. Johnson
488 N.E.2d 439 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Monger v. Florida
405 U.S. 958 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Bunn v. State
202 So. 2d 176 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)