Parrot Jungle-Franscher, Inc. v. Bing

Supreme Court of Florida

Parrot Jungle-Franscher, Inc. v. Bing

187 So. 2d 334, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3697

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1966

DocketNo. 34961

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 334 (Parrot Jungle-Franscher, Inc. v. Bing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrot Jungle-Franscher, Inc. v. Bing, 187 So. 2d 334, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3697 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 18, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the respondent’s request for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is granted in the amount of $250.00.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI