Parrish v. State

133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 495
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1926
Docket17309
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 877 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. State, 133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of knowingly permitting an apparatus for manufacturing liquor to he located on his premises. The court did not err in admitting the evidence complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, nor in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 877, 35 Ga. App. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-gactapp-1926.